Se enkelt indlæg
  #6 (permalink)  
Gammel 20th November 2011, 12:12 PM
Vymer Vymer er offline
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 8,918
Standard

Citer:
Oprindeligt indsendt af Merovingian Se indlæg
vymer
1: forstår ikke rigtigt din logik eller mangel på samme? fordi Irak ikke havde WMD betyder det jo ikke at Iran ikke har det?

dvs efter samme logik: hvis en person er blevet dømt uskyldigt for bankrøvere ved vi at ALLE der dømmes for bankrøveri i al fremtiden er uskyldige.

det er jo bare whack

2: der er en kæmpe forskel imellem Irak og Iran er jo den at FN frikendte Irak, men modsat siger at Iran ER ved at udvikle a-våben.



Prøv at læses disse artikler og vurderer så om du virkelig ved noget om Irans atomprogram eller om du blot er blevet manipuleret af dygtige folk.

Fra 2007
Going Nuclear: Before and After - Tehran Bureau | FRONTLINE | PBS
Citer:
The Iranians may have an atom bomb within two years, the authoritative Jane's Defence Weekly warned. That was in 1984, two decades ago.

Four years later, the world was again put on notice, this time by Iraq, that Tehran was at the nuclear threshold, and in 1992 the CIA foresaw atomic arms in Iranian hands by 2000[/b]. Then U.S. officials pushed that back to 2003. And in 1997 the Israelis confidently predicted a new date -- 2005.[b]

Now, as 2006 wears on, and a global focus sharpens on Iran's nuclear ambitions, the coming of any Iranian doomsday arsenal looks to be years away, experts say. Those past predictions consistently underplayed the technological challenges of a bomb program.

Iran itself, which said Tuesday it has begun enriching small amounts of uranium, denies its enrichment program is intended to produce anything beyond weaker fuel for civilian nuclear power plants, not the highly enriched uranium that can fuel a bomb.

The United Nations Security Council is expected to take up the issue next month, when skeptics may push for sanctions against Tehran. But few specialists view a potential Iranian bomb as an imminent threat.

In fact, the latest estimate from the CIA and other U.S. intelligence agencies sees no Iranian bomb before the next decade. Israeli defense experts agree, speaking of a 2012 date.

Read more: Going Nuclear: Before and After - Tehran Bureau | FRONTLINE | PBS

Og lidt mere "information" fra helt upartiske folk Bemærk de datoer.
Bad Intelligence–But in Which Direction? | Cato @ Liberty

Citer:
“Late 1991: In congressional reports and CIA assessments, the United States estimates that there is a ‘high degree of certainty that the government of Iran has acquired all or virtually all of the components required for the construction of two to three nuclear weapons.’ A February 1992 report by the U.S. House of Representatives suggests that these two or three nuclear weapons will be operational between February and April 1992.
De satans iranere havde bomben tilbage i 1992!!!

Du kan tolke som du har lyst, men det ligner Irak på en prik i mine øjne. En undskyldning for at angribe.
Historien om Iraks masseødelæggelsesvåben var jo løgn fra ende til anden og skabt med det formål at manipulere folk til at støtte en krig. Jeg hoppede ikke på den med a-våben, men faldt for deres kemiske våben omend jeg ikke så det som en grund for invasion.


Kan du bevise at du ikke nu bliver udsat for en tilsvarende psy-ops Jeg ser frem til de FN rapporter som viser Irans store fremskridt i udviklingen af a-våben.

P.S. rapporter baseret på opluysninger fra "anonyme" men venligsindede lande godtages ikke.

......................

Og sjovt nok havde man i 2009 kommet til den konklusion at Iran var på vej frem omend man intet havde at bygge den historie på. Altså ikke andet end en voksende konsensus. Måske skulle man hellere kalde det en konsensus for krig??

Nuclear Bomb Articles | U.S. now sees Iran as pursuing nuclear bomb - Los Angeles Times

Citer:
U.S. officials said that although no new evidence had surfaced to undercut the findings of the 2007 estimate, there was growing consensus that it provided a misleading picture and that the country was poised to reach crucial bomb-making milestones this year.

Sidst redigeret af Vymer : 20th November 2011 kl. 12:18 PM.
Besvar med citat