Citer:
Oprindeligt indsendt af tach
Det skulle undre mig, da man ikke kan forklare noget der ikke er korrekt.
|
Du skulle vel aldrig være finansøkonom?
Okay, kig med - det er godt nok på engelsk, men prøv alligevel:
Citer:
|
Similarly, a Collateralized Debt Obligation (CDO) is not a derivative, but a security. It is similar in concept to an MBS, except the pool is not made up of mortgages, but rather various debt instruments, such as corporate bonds.
|
Fra denne:
How To Speak “Structured Finance” « Derivative Dribble
Her er, hvorfor Wikipedia har narret dig:
Citer:
|
Other than asset composition, other factors can cause CDOs to be more complicated. For starters, some structures use leverage and credit derivatives that can trick even the senior tranche out of being deemed safe. These structures can become synthetic CDOs that are backed merely by derivatives and credit default swaps made between lenders and in the derivative markets.
|
Men - en mand med en hat på er en mand, ikke en hat - enig?
CDOs And The Mortgage Market