Gå tilbage leveret af  Boliga logo    
Boligdebatten.dk   Boligdebatten.dk > Politik og Økonomi > Politik
Opret bruger OSS Søgning Dagens indlæg Marker alt som læst


Svar
 
Emne værktøjer Visningsmåde
  #1 (permalink)  
Gammel 14th June 2019, 03:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 8,699
Standard US-Iran og olietankerangrebene

En førstehåndsvidneerklæring fra det japanske tankskib som ikke passer ind i den amerikanske fortælling. Glem ikke hvem der ønsker krig i denne konflikt, når USA prøver at styre pressen og fortællingen. Ikke at der kræves så meget for at få succes.

Operator suggests tanker was hit by flying projectile: Kyodo News


Citer:
The Japanese operator of a tanker attacked near the Strait of Hormuz suggested Friday the vessel was hit by an incoming projectile, not by torpedo.

Some crew members of the Kokuka Courageous, which was attacked twice in the major shipping route Thursday, have said they "witnessed a flying object" at the moment of the second attack, said Yutaka Katada, president of the Tokyo-based operator Kokuka Sangyo Co., at a press conference.

Katada said it is unlikely that the tanker was attacked "because the attacker thought it was a Japanese vessel," saying the ship was flying the national flag of Panama while sailing.
Besvar med citat
  #2 (permalink)  
Gammel 14th June 2019, 04:02 PM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 8,699
Standard

Lidt mere stof til eftertanke.

Fra Financial Times

https://twitter.com/joshua_landis/st...40839426904064

Citer:
Owner of stricken Japanese tanker says ‘flying object’ likely hit ship not limpet mine. Contradicts Pompeo, but Japanese said the explosions were on the port side of the ship. US images showed damage and a suspected limpet mine on the starboard side.

Sidst redigeret af Vymer : 15th June 2019 kl. 04:44 AM.
Besvar med citat
  #3 (permalink)  
Gammel 15th June 2019, 04:44 AM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 8,699
Standard

Værd at husk på at efterretningstjenester altid har haft en rolle i at manipulere andre ind i en krig.

Fra Anden Verdenskrig, men et relevant eksempel den dag idag.



The secret persuaders: The Guardian

Citer:
It was 1940, the Nazis were in the ascendant, the Blitz at its deadliest, and Britain's last hope was to bring a reluctant United States into the war. So it was that the largest covert operation in UK history was launched. William Boyd sheds light on a forgotten spy ring.
...
Stephenson called his methods "political warfare", but the remarkable fact about BSC was that no one had ever tried to achieve such a level of "spin", as we would call it today, on such a vast and pervasive scale in another country. The aim was to change the minds of an entire population: to make the people of America think that joining the war in Europe was a "good thing" and thereby free Roosevelt to act without fear of censure from Congress or at the polls in an election.
Besvar med citat
  #4 (permalink)  
Gammel 16th June 2019, 07:07 AM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 8,699
Standard

Nok en historie om hvorfor man skal starte med at betragte alt der kommer fra USAs regering som løgn indtil andet er bevist. De er ude på at skabe en krig.

The Taliban claimed an attack on U.S. forces. Pompeo blamed Iran.: Washington Post
Besvar med citat
  #5 (permalink)  
Gammel 17th June 2019, 09:18 AM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 8,699
Standard

Aviser såsom Jyllandsposten viser de intet har lært fra Irakkrigen. Og hvorfor "False Flag" operationer vil fortsætte. Journalister evner ikke den fornødne skepsis.

Diverse eksempler diskuteret af amerikanske efterretningsfolk, men det kunne osse være danskere.

https://washingtonsblog.com/2017/11/...y-discuss.html
Besvar med citat
  #6 (permalink)  
Gammel 28th June 2019, 05:18 PM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 8,699
Standard

De nyttige idioter er blevet udnyttet så nu kan man distancerer sig fra USAs påstande.

U.A.E. Splits With U.S. Over Blame for Oil Tanker Attack in May: Bloomberg

Citer:
“Honestly we can’t point the blame at any country because we don’t have evidence,” Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah Bin Zayed Al Nahyan said on Wednesday in Moscow. “If there is a country that has the evidence, then I’m convinced that the international community will listen to it. But we need to make sure the evidence is precise and convincing.”

While an investigation by the U.A.E., Norway and Saudi Arabia concluded that a “state actor” was most likely behind the incident in May, no nation was singled out. Still, U.S. National Security Adviser John Bolton has said that Iran was almost certainly responsible.
Besvar med citat
Svar


Emne værktøjer
Visningsmåde

Regler for indlæg
Du kan ikke starte nye emner
Du kan ikke svare på indlæg
Du kan ikke vedhæfte filer
Du kan ikke rette dine indlæg

vB code er aktiv
Smilies er aktiv
[IMG] kode er aktiv
HTML kode er ikke aktiv
Trackbacks are aktiv
Pingbacks are aktiv
Refbacks are ikke aktiv

Lignende emner
Emne Startet af Forum Svar Nyeste indlæg
Iran - en ny krig på vej. Vymer Politik 3 30th May 2019 05:24 AM
Iran-Irak Krigen Vymer Politik 0 6th January 2019 01:15 AM
Kuwait - på vej over til Iran? Vymer Politik 0 22nd October 2018 07:54 AM
Iran og WMD Vymer Politik 0 26th October 2014 02:30 PM
En aftale med Iran er i hus. Vymer Politik 1 24th November 2013 11:47 AM



Al tidssætning er GMT +1. Klokken er nu 08:11 AM.



Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.