Gå tilbage leveret af  Boliga logo    
Boligdebatten.dk   Boligdebatten.dk > Politik og Økonomi > Politik
Opret bruger OSS Søgning Dagens indlæg Marker alt som læst


Svar
 
Emne værktøjer Visningsmåde
  #1 (permalink)  
Gammel 19th July 2019, 07:03 AM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 8,764
Standard USA-Iran - sådan manipulerer man sin befolkning.

Enhver offensiv krig kræver lidt forarbejde på sin egen befolkning for at hisse en stemning op.

I Libyen var det løgne om "massakre, massakre" og med Iran er det disse punkter.

How Corporate Media Are Fueling a New Iran Nuclear Crisis : Truthdig

Citer:
comments

How Corporate Media Are Fueling a New Iran Nuclear Crisis
Screen shot of a recent Fox Business report about U.S.-Iran relations. (Fox Business via YouTube)

The U.S. news media’s coverage of the Iran nuclear issue has been woefully off-kilter for many years. Now, however, those same outlets are contributing to the serious crisis building between Washington and Tehran.

God afsløring af disse "historier" om Iran. At Iran genopbygger sit lagre af atommateriale er jo blot en genopbygning af den forhandlingsposition de havde da man indgik aftalen og før USA løb fra den.

Fx.
Citer:
But Gladstone cited only one “expert,” Henry Rome of the Eurasia Group, who called the Iranian claim “a unilateral interpretation from the Iranian side of what the nuclear deal means….”

Rome is evidently unfamiliar, however, with the fundamental principle of international law that grants a party to an agreement the inherent right to reduce or terminate the fulfillment of an agreement if there is a “material breach” by another party. In response to an email query for this story, Dr. Richard Falk, a leading scholar on international law, responded to Rome’s statement by commenting, “The U.S. repudiation of the agreement and reimposition of sanctions constitutes without any reasonable doubt, a material breach of the Nuclear Agreement, which relieves Iran of any legal obligations with respect to complying with the treaty.”
Besvar med citat
  #2 (permalink)  
Gammel 24th July 2019, 12:17 PM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 8,764
Standard

Interessant problemstilling for Danmark.

Britisk dårskab fører til at DK måske skal sende et skib til Hormuz.


https://www.juancole.com/2019/07/tri...rontation.html

Disse tre punkt kommenteres ikke meget i dansk presse.
Citer:
There were three problems with the British reasoning, presumably that of Jeremy Hunt, British Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and trailing candidate for prime minister. (Maybe also painfully inexperienced defense minister Penny Mordaunt, appointed in May):

First, the EU ban on oil sales to Syria concerned only EU member states.

Second, the Grace I was in international waters and seizing it is a form of piracy.

Third, there is no proof it was headed for Syria (which would not have been illegal in international law in any case).
Besvar med citat
  #3 (permalink)  
Gammel 16th August 2019, 02:43 PM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 8,764
Standard

Grænser for amerikansk indflydelse.


https://www.asiatimes.com/2019/08/ar...an-oil-tanker/

Citer:
The paper earlier reported that the territory’s Supreme Court had received a request from the US Department of Justice for “mutual legal assistance in a bid to seize the ship.”

The US request came after National Security Adviser John Bolton was visiting the United Kingdom, which claims Gibraltar as a territory.

But after the court reconvened at 4pm local time, Chief Justice Anthony Dudley revealed his court had not been passed along any official applications from the American authorities, and so had declined to respond.
Besvar med citat
  #4 (permalink)  
Gammel 4th September 2019, 07:18 AM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 8,764
Standard

Bemærkelsesværdigt at man uden krigserklæring kan angribe et andet lands militær. Fint eksempel på at magt er ret, og hvad der venter os, europæer i fremtiden.

American Cyber Command hamstrung Iran’s paramilitary force: MIT Technology Review.

Artiklen inkluderer osse et klassisk eksempel på hvorledes tekst kan manipulerer folks opfattelse af verden.

Citer:
The attack was launched by US Cyber Command. It targeted and reportedly wiped out a key database used by Iran's paramilitary forces known as the Islamic Revolutionary Guards. The Revolutionary Guards is responsible for mine attacks that hit two oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, US officials allege. Iran denies responsibility.
Der erklæres klart at iranerne er ansvarlige for mineangreb og så påhæftes "US officials allege". Havde linien været omvendt var der ingen klar beskydning.
Besvar med citat
Svar


Emne værktøjer
Visningsmåde

Regler for indlæg
Du kan ikke starte nye emner
Du kan ikke svare på indlæg
Du kan ikke vedhæfte filer
Du kan ikke rette dine indlæg

vB code er aktiv
Smilies er aktiv
[IMG] kode er aktiv
HTML kode er ikke aktiv
Trackbacks are aktiv
Pingbacks are aktiv
Refbacks are ikke aktiv

Lignende emner
Emne Startet af Forum Svar Nyeste indlæg
Iran og atomvåen - Sådan skabes grundlaget for en ny krig. Vymer Politik 29 26th November 2011 06:17 PM
Københavns befolkning 2005-10 thsv Generelt 25 30th August 2010 08:43 AM
S: Hjort manipulerer med jobredning BamsesFar Generelt 9 16th December 2009 10:28 PM
BRF manipulerer igen andelkbh Generelt 3 25th August 2009 11:39 AM



Al tidssætning er GMT +1. Klokken er nu 12:21 PM.



Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.