Gå tilbage leveret af  Boliga logo    
Boligdebatten.dk   Boligdebatten.dk > Politik og Økonomi > Politik
Opret bruger OSS Søgning Dagens indlæg Marker alt som læst


Svar
 
Emne værktøjer Visningsmåde
  #1 (permalink)  
Gammel 8th January 2021, 08:31 PM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 9,174
Standard Pressens rolle i at styre opfattelse af optøjer

Dansk presses ubehag ved Trump er ikke anderledes end den man ser i amerikansk presse. Men en hurtigt sammenligning med BLM optøjerne.

Og den klassiske dobbeltmoral har osse sin plads. Her er det VOX der udstilles. https://twitter.com/ErikWhi70627234/...67965331652608

Besvar med citat
  #2 (permalink)  
Gammel 9th January 2021, 02:12 PM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Jul 2009
Indlæg: 3,189
Standard

Nooooh, hvor er det synd for de racistiske ultakonservative små stakler.
Besvar med citat
  #3 (permalink)  
Gammel 10th January 2021, 06:44 PM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 9,174
Standard

Det er sør'me osse synd for dig. Du viser dig jo nem at manipulere. Dvs at udnytte


Kan du huske dansk presses dækning af de ukrainske optøjer mod den demokratisk valgte præsident? Sammenlign den med USA.

Det er sådan man styre vælgerkvæget.
Besvar med citat
  #4 (permalink)  
Gammel 28th January 2021, 01:49 AM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 9,174
Standard

Statslig involvering i optøjerne?

Det her minder om NDP-sagen i Tyskland.

Exclusive: Proud Boys leader was ‘prolific’ informer for law enforcement: Reuters

NDP: Wikipedia

Citer:
Germany's domestic security agency, classifies the NPD as a "threat to the constitutional order" because of its platform and ideology, and it is under their observation.[22] An effort to outlaw the party failed in 2003, because the government had many informers and agents in the party, some in high position, who had written part of the material used against them
Besvar med citat
  #5 (permalink)  
Gammel 4th February 2021, 06:13 AM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 9,174
Standard

Et par journalister fra Reuters viser hvorledes man ændre opfattelsen af en begivenhed ved at redigere gengivelsen korrekt.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-u...-idUSKBN2A335W

Citer:
The assault on the building led to the second impeachment of former President Donald Trump, who spoke at a rally in his final days in office and urged supporters to go to the Capitol and “fight.” His impeachment trial in the Senate for inciting the siege is scheduled to start next week.


WSJ har en korrekt gengivelse af Trumps tale og voila man får et helt andet indtryk.

What Trump Said to Supporters on Jan. 6 Before Their Capitol Riot


Citer:
“Republicans are constantly fighting like a boxer with his hands tied behind his back. It’s like a boxer. And we want to be so nice. We want to be so respectful of everybody, including bad people. And we’re going to have to fight much harder. And Mike Pence is going to have to come through for us. And if he doesn’t, that will be a sad day for our country because you’re sworn to uphold our Constitution....
Besvar med citat
  #6 (permalink)  
Gammel 8th February 2021, 12:40 AM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 9,174
Standard

Noget journalisterne vidste før de skrev diverse historier. Nu skal hele sagen blot sendes "down the memory hole".


Why has Donald Trump not faced charges for criminal incitement?: The Hill

Citer:
Indeed, other experts were swift to repeat their certainty of yet another criminal charge. Tribe declared, “This guy was inciting not just imminent lawless action, but the violent decapitation of a coordinate branch of the government, preventing this peaceful transition of power and putting a violent mob into the Capitol while he cheered them on.” Bolstering such claims, District of Columbia Attorney General Karl Racine announced he was investigating Trump for a possible incitement charge.

What is strange is that there is no word of an interview, let alone a charge, for a purportedly clear crime committed over a month ago. One possible reason is that it would collapse in court. It is so much easier to claim easy prosecutions than to prosecute such made for television charges. I do not fault these experts for speculating about such a case, but many claim that prosecution would be relatively simple. That is just not true.
Besvar med citat
  #7 (permalink)  
Gammel 12th February 2021, 08:04 AM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 9,174
Standard

En løgn som New York Times og venner har udbredt i en lille måned. Lidt ligesom historien om Trump og hans russiske forbindelser.


He Dreamed of Being a Police Officer, Then Was Killed by a Pro-Trump Mob -

The death of Brian Sicknick, a military veteran and experienced Capitol Police officer...
NYT


I den virkelig verden er der ingen officielle informationer om hvorledes Sicknick døde.

MAGA Blood Libel: Why Are They Hiding The Medical Report?: Revolver


Citer:
Last week, CNN was tactically baffled by a simple question that grows stranger by the day: Why are investigators struggling to build a murder case in the death of US Capitol Police Officer Sicknick?

The stakes are high: Officer Sicknick’s death is the only purported death by a largely tourist crowd that was let into the building by police, stayed inside the velvet ropes, seemed at least partly there out of confusion, for social media clout, or just for the memes, and that even the New York Times conceded caused limited property damage.

That’s a far cry from murder. Yet MAGA is being blood libeled with a felony murder charge in the court of public opinion and at Donald Trump’s impeachment, while potentially exculpatory evidence is silenced or sealed. As the Washington Uniparty mulls domestic terror laws over a MAGA Bloodbath, it increasingly looks like MAGA may have been Bloodbathed. Time is of the essence for the Feds to release all evidence, damn the guilty, or the clear the MAGA movement of these serious allegations.
Besvar med citat
  #8 (permalink)  
Gammel 13th February 2021, 05:29 AM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 9,174
Standard

Vi fik at vide det var højre-ekstremister i stort tal der stormede the capitol...


Most Capitol Riot Suspects Have No Far-Right Group Ties, a Challenge in Fight Against Extremism - About 16% of those facing federal charges have known affiliations with extremist organizations . Wall Street Journal
Besvar med citat
  #9 (permalink)  
Gammel 13th February 2021, 07:09 PM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 9,174
Standard

Informations Martin Bucharth viser hvorledes bønderne manipuleres. Historien skal "down the memory hole"

Skammens dag: Da demonstranter stormede Kongressen, og USA’s demokrati mistede sin uskyld : Information



Citer:
Siden den korte britisk-amerikanske krig i 1812 er den romerskinspirerede kongresbygning i USA’s hovedstad aldrig blevet stormet af en væbnet milits. I det år satte de britiske styrker ild til Kongressen.

Der har været en række angreb på The Capitol gennem årene.

Markant er fx. Puertoricanske frihedskæmperes beskydning af repræsentanter i Huset.

1954 United States Capitol shooting

Citer:
The nationalists, identified as Lolita Lebrón, Rafael Cancel Miranda, Andres Figueroa Cordero, and Irvin Flores Rodríguez, unfurled a Puerto Rican flag and began shooting at Representatives in the 83rd Congress, who were debating an immigration bill. Five Representatives were wounded, one seriously, but all recovered. The assailants were arrested, tried and convicted in federal court, and given long sentences, effectively life imprisonment. In 1978 and 1979, their sentences were commuted by President Jimmy Carter.[2] All four returned to Puerto Rico.
Og diverse bombeangreb

Weather Underground's angreb i 1971

Og 1983 bombeangrebet ved senatets bygning.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resist...onspiracy_case
Besvar med citat
  #10 (permalink)  
Gammel 18th February 2021, 07:39 PM
Senior Member
 
Registreringsdato: Nov 2008
Indlæg: 9,174
Standard

En status


The False and Exaggerated Claims Still Being Spread About the Capitol Riot: Glen Greenwald
Besvar med citat
Svar


Emne værktøjer
Visningsmåde

Regler for indlæg
Du kan ikke starte nye emner
Du kan ikke svare på indlæg
Du kan ikke vedhæfte filer
Du kan ikke rette dine indlæg

vB code er aktiv
Smilies er aktiv
[IMG] kode er aktiv
HTML kode er ikke aktiv
Trackbacks are aktiv
Pingbacks are aktiv
Refbacks are ikke aktiv

Lignende emner
Emne Startet af Forum Svar Nyeste indlæg
Låntagers fejlagtige opfattelse af dansk realkredit. BOBOB Finansiering 0 5th February 2018 09:51 AM
Pressens rolle i USA. gør hvad statsmagten siger ellers ... Vymer Off-topic 1 30th May 2013 04:27 PM
interessant debat om Ægypten og militærjuntaens styre Vymer Politik 0 4th March 2011 05:30 PM
Pressens troværdighed i betydelig bedring klogeaage 35 Generelt 8 8th April 2010 11:57 PM



Al tidssætning er GMT +1. Klokken er nu 02:29 PM.



Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.